|
Ohio Gun Law Blocked By
Restraining Order
CINCINNATI, OHIO
(Tuesday, July 18, 2000) - Judge Robert Ruehlman today issued a restraining
order against enforcement of Ohio's law banning concealed carry of firearms
as well as the law banning loaded firearms in a motor vehicle. The order
affects the City of Cincinnati and Hamilton County. Backers of the legal
action are very pleased.
"These laws
are in clear violation of both Ohio and U.S. Constitutions and were ripe for
challenges after the Pat Feely decision," proclaimed Alan Gottlieb,
Founder of the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF). "We saw a huge
opportunity to advance the rights of self-defense and took advantage of
it."
In addition to blocking enforcement of R.C. 2923.12 (banning concealed
carry) the Judge included R.C. 2923.16, (loaded gun in a motor vehicle). The
restraining order will be in place until after the preliminary injunction
hearing beginning August 11, 2000.
Until that time, law-abiding adult residents of Cincinnati and Hamilton
County can legally carry a loaded firearm on their person or in their car
without risk of arrest or prosecution PROVIDED that they do not violate
other laws prohibiting possession in bars, schools, or other specified
places. The law preventing felons and other disqualified from possessing
guns, R.C. 2923.13, is also still in effect.
The restraining
order makes Hamilton County unique. The only state with a similar carry law
is Vermont, where any law-abiding adult can carry a gun if they have a
driver's license or some other form of photo identification. Including
Vermont, 43 states allow the lawful concealed carry of firearms. Only 7
states, including Ohio, deny the individual's right of self-defense outside
one's home or fixed place of business.
The complaint
called the current scheme a violation of both the Ohio Constitutions
(Article 1, Section 1 [inalienable rights to defending life, liberty and
property] & Article 1, Section 4 [bear arms for defense and security])
and the U.S. Constitution (Second Amendment [keep & bear arms], Ninth
Amendment [self-defense], and Fourteenth Amendment [Equal Protection,
Incorporation of Bill of Rights to the States]). But Judge Robert Ruehlman
found yet another problem under current law.
"The judge
made it clear that the current law treats people as guilty until proven
innocent," said attorney William Gustavson. "If this order is
upheld, the burden of proof will switch to the Government to show why the
person should not be allowed to carry a firearm for self-defense."
In a recent case
against a pizza delivery driver, both the prosecutor and the judge stated
that the law should be changed or repealed. The defendant, Pat Feely, was
known to carry large sums of cash in bad neighborhoods as part of his
employment. He was acquitted at trial, but could have faced the same charges
if found carrying a concealed firearm again unless the restraining order was
issued. Such unfairness opened the door for throwing the unconstitutional
law out.
"For years,
Gov. Bob Taft and the anti-self-defense crowd have blocked reasonable
standards for issuing concealed carry licenses," stated Dave LaCourse,
SAF Public Affairs Director. "Now they have their wish, and Hamilton
County allows law-abiding people to carry of firearms without a license. I
hope this decision sends a message to them that the Ohio and U.S.
Constitutions are still valid and binding."
The Second
Amendment Foundation is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt
education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the
Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms.
Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 600,000 members and
supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public
about the gun control debate and its consequences. SAF previously has funded
successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles, New
Haven, CT, and San Francisco on behalf of American gun owners. Current
projects include a damage action lawsuit against the cities suing gun
makers, an amicus brief in support of the Emerson case holding that the
Second Amendment is an individual right and a lawsuit against the Clinton
gun and magazine ban.
SAF's web site is
at http://www.saf.org/
The Paul Revere
Network - http://www.PaulRevere.org
|