"Blue Dogs"
Want Democratic Party to Distance Itself from Gun Control
They
"Don't Want Gun Control to Be Part of the Agenda"
Members of the House
"Blue Dog" coalition—a group of conservative Democrats—have
been discussing the issue of gun control ever since the November 7
elections, according to a recent article in the Congressional Quarterly
Daily Monitor. The result of these discussions? They "don't want (gun
control) to be part of the Democratic agenda," according to U.S.
Representative Marion Berry (D-Ark.). Berry went on to say, "We just
don't think it's a good issue for the party." The concern was prompted
by Democratic losses in several races that were directly attributed to the
party's attacks on the Second Amendment. The crushing defeat of Democrat
Scotty Baesler by U.S.
Rep. Ernie Fletcher (R-Ky.) seemed to highlight the concerns of the Blue
Dogs. Baesler, who gave up the seat now held by Fletcher in 1998 to run for
the U.S. Senate (Baesler lost that race to current U.S. Senator Jim Bunning,
a pro-gun stalwart), ran an extremely anti-gun campaign, that was heavily
supported by gun-ban extremists, such as those at HCI. His campaign included
an expensive media campaign, the exploitation of crime victims to promote
his agenda, and his wife even appeared on the "Rosie O'Donnell
Show" to promote Baesler's anti-gun views. Fletcher wound up winning by
an 18 point margin.
Some House Democratic
aides blamed the Clinton-Gore Administration's anti-gun agenda for their
problems, and one said, "Democratic members had to defend Clinton's
aggressivity [sic] on the issue." While NRA would certainly welcome the
Democratic Party's leadership abandoning gun control as a party platform, we
are not holding our breath, but certainly appreciate any support members of
the Blue Dog coalition may offer.
Source:
NRA
|