|
Gun Use And Responsible
Citizenship
Analysis by David
Morgan, The Asheville Tribune
According to John L. Lott,
a University of Chicago law and economics fellow, every product has illegitimate
uses and undesirable consequences. In 1996 in the U. S., car accidents killed
43,000 people and injured 3.4 million; 959 children under the age of 15 drowned
in pools and while boating; 500 children died in bicycle accidents, and more
than 1,000 children died from residential fires. No one is yet proposing that
state or city governments should recoup medical costs or police salaries by
suing automobile companies, pool builders or makers of home heaters. But suing
manufacturers for any costs cities incur from gun injuries and deaths is exactly
the theory behind the lawsuits by Chicago, New Orleans and other cities against
gun makers.
The New Orleans suit seeks
to hold gun makers liable because accidental deaths are foreseeable and not
enough was done to make guns safe. It is particularly concerned with accidental
deaths involving children and cites 3 cases in New Orleans since 1992.
Nationally, 30 children under 5 and 200 under 15 died from accidental gun deaths
in 1996. Given that some 80 million people own approximately 220 million guns,
gun owners must be very responsible, or such gun accidents would be much more
frequent.
Lott goes on to report that
Americans also use guns defensively about 2.5 million times a year, and 98% of
the time merely brandishing the weapon is sufficient to stop an attack. The
chances of serious injury from an attack are 2.5 times greater for women
offering no resistance than for those resisting with guns. In addition a 1996
survey by the National Association of Chiefs of Police found that 93% of 15,000
chiefs and sheriffs questioned, thought that law-abiding citizens should be able
to buy guns for self-defense.
It has also been shown that
in every instance where the citizens insisted on their right to carry a
concealed weapon that the crime rates in those areas fell dramatically once law
abiding citizens exercised their right to do so. Nowhere did crime rates go up.
Carnage was predicted when Oregon enacted a law mandating that citizens be
granted a carry license after background checks. As a result 2,200 carry permits
were issued in Portland in the first seven months of 1990, compared to only 17
the previous year. Homicide fell 33 percent, the second largest drop of any
major city.
The adage currently being
promoted that more gun controls mean less crime is simply false. Gun controls
have rarely proven to be effective in reducing homicide rates. Puerto Rico has
relied on drastic gun control provisions requiring a range of background checks
and permits which take up to 1- 1/2 years to get. Yet, Puerto Rican police
report a record 80 killings in December and 20 in the first two weeks of 1999.
In 1998, the island experienced 648 murders among its 3.8 million residents for
a resounding homicide rate of 17 per 100,000 residents. All that despite the
islands 18,000 police officers. Our cities in the U.S. with the toughest gun
control laws, such as Washington D.C. and Detroit have some of the highest crime
rates. Meanwhile, in Australia, where recent draconian bans on semi-automatic
and pump-action firearms resulted in confiscation of tens of thousands of guns,
crime rates in the last 12 months have skyrocketed. Homicides are up by 3.2%,
assaults are up by 8.6%, and armed robberies are up by a full 44%.
In Switzerland, gun
ownership and use is not a matter of free choice . It is a community duty and is
mandatory. In a nation of 6 million people, the Swiss have a standing army of
only 1,500 men. However, they can mobilize a standing army, combat ready, of
over 650,000 troops within 24 hours. The Swiss government makes it easy for any
adult, whether or not in the military, to learn how to use military weapons.
When the government adopts a new rifle , it sells the old ones to the public.
The army will even sell to its citizens a variety of machine guns, as well as
anti-tank weapons, howitzers, anti-aircraft guns, and cannons. The Swiss even
subsidize ammunition purchases for its citizens. Preserving freedom and
democracy is not just a citizens right - it is a duty. Thus, in a nation of just
six million people, there are at least 2 million guns, including 600,000 fully
automatic assault rifles (more than in the entire United States) and half a
million pistols.
Despite all the guns,
murder is only 15% of the American rate, and well below the Canadian,
Australian, New Zealand , and Jamaican rates, even though Switzerland has more
guns per capital than all of them.
A society with a great deal
of guns is not necessarily a society with a great deal of gun problems. More
important than the number of guns is their cultural context. Gun ownership in
Switzerland is a mandatory community duty, not a matter of individual free
choice. Defense of the nation is the responsibility of every male citizen.
Genocide has never occurred in any nation whose citizens were armed. Cultural
conditions, not gun laws, have proven to be the most important factors in a
nations crime rate. The framers of the Second Amendment envisioned a policy in
which gun ownership and use - like voting, jury duty, and paying taxes - was one
of the basic components of responsible citizenship. The encouragement and
instruction of mature, responsible gun use is by far the best policy for our
country.
Send your comment to feedback@ashevilletribune.com
|